Google

When the cure is worse than the disease

April 30, 2008 | Filed Under 00Publius Contributor, Business, Congress, Dan Scott, Democrats/Leftists, Economy/Finances, Energy, Media Bias, News, Science, Society/Culture | 3 Comments

-By Dan Scott

In my last article I ended with mentioning that there will be increased Ethanol mandates on top of the absurdity of the failed government policy on electric generation. The current run up in food prices is devastating to the world’s poor. How else does one explain the food riots in Haiti, Egypt and Bangladesh? Are they so far away that it is easy for us to ignore, play ignorant or the part we played in it? We are looking at the beginning of a huge humanitarian crisis of epic proportions if ethanol mandates and subsidies are not immediately suspended.

Low global wheat stocks, coupled with the emergence of a virulent crop disease, are threatening the world’s food supply, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Edward Schafer told food aid groups Wednesday.

“We have never been less secure about the near-term future of wheat,” he said. “Here in the United States it is our most basic crop with a farm gate value of $16 billion (€10 billion). Global wheat stocks are at an unprecedented historic 30-year low, and U.S. wheat stocks are at unprecedented 60-year low.”

While the articles referenced here attempt to down play the seriousness of the food price rise by saying it is due to a number of causes, such semantics are lost on the world’s poor whose wages haven’t risen in tandem with the price of grains and rice. Regardless of the growth of India and China, ethanol made from corn or any other food crop or displaced food crop is the straw that breaks the camel’s back on food stocks. Is there a “food” shortage? Technically no by a sliver, a shortage by definition is not having enough supply to cover the demand. The fact that stocks exists means there is something. What there is for the poor of the world who live at the margins with nothing to spare is a money shortage, a severe reduction in their standard of living, for them it is a zero sum game. A person can starve to death when there is no shortage of food when the price is so high they can’t afford to eat.

I have spoken before regarding the impact of one group buying up as much as their lifestyle allows to the determent of others in regards to energy use. Here with the food price hikes we have an example of what happens when government policy exerts an artificial demand on a limited supply. The speculative bubble was created by the legislators in Congress and those in Europe with the Ethanol mandate and subsidy. If the mandate and subsidy didn’t exist, there would be no bubble. What we have here is an artificially produced constraint on food supply due to Ethanol caused by legislative fiat. This is precisely the same incompetence via so called public policy that caused the housing mortgage debacle, politicians interfering with the workings of the market by lacks lending standards which artificially created demand and hiked prices. Al Gore started the mess with Ethanol in 1994: The AGW supporters claim global warming will harm the poor of the world, I ask you, how can you support AGW and ethanol when in fact you are starving the world’s poor, the very people you claimed you’re trying to save. This is a classic case the cure being worse than the disease.

I will put this in very black and white terms: Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have the power in their hands to alleviate the suffering of the world’s poor with an exercise of political courage by repealing the ethanol mandates and subsidies. If they fail to rise up to the challenge of our times, which by the way, they helped create, then they will go down in history as two people who condoned genocide of the world’s poor by sacrificing them on the altar of AGW just so they could sanctimoniously claim they were trying to save the planet. How many millions will die on the altar of AGW? How many is too many? Will you continue to close your eyes to the suffering of the world’s poor that you caused in ignorance if you claim you didn’t intend this result? If you didn’t intend starving the world’s poor, then you have an ethical obligation to undo the damage you caused. If on the other hand, you care little for the poor, then say nothing like Al Gore is doing now and let them starve.

Millions will literally starve to death due to the diversion of food crops to ethanol just to satisfy some politically correct ideology. The names of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid will be synonymous with starvation just as Neville Chamberlain is with appeasement. AGW and Ethanol have become the most grotesque abuse of environmentalism since Rachel Carlson instigated the deaths of millions of poor people in Africa due to her DDT environmental propaganda. By the end of summer we will be seeing starvation in the third world if we do not act immediately. It is outright genocide of the poor.

Lately, we have been presented with commercials featuring so called conservatives who appeared with liberal AGW supporters claiming we need to do something about Global Warming. The argument advanced by people such as Newt Gingrich, who collaborated with the AGW supporters is we must have a seat at the table to minimize any extreme solutions presented. However, to be at the table is to share the responsibility for the policy failures upon which were compromised such as Ethanol. Starving the world’s poor to save them from AGW is a failed policy in my book. There is no upside to being at the table, there are only negatives. Claiming that we must be at the table to limit the negative consequences is a tacit admission that any effort agreed to will result in failure. No thank you, I choose not to share the blame as though I agreed with the premise in the first place, instead I demand accountability of those who make decisions. Repeal the Ethanol mandates and subsidies now!
———-
Dan Scott calls himself a “Member of the Global Capitalist Cabal preaching Capitalism and personal responsibility as the economic solution to world poverty.” He is also a member of the 14th Amendment Society — victimhood is a liberal code word for denying the civil rights of others. He is also a proud member of the Global Warming Denier Cabal, insisting that facts not agendas determine the truth.

Dan can be seen on the web at http://www.geocities.com/fightbigotry2002/ as well as http://www.geocities.com/dscott8186/saidwebpage.htm, And can be reached for comments at dscott8186@yahoo.com.


Leave a Comment

If you would like to make a comment, please register to do so. I hate to do that but there are so many spam-bots out there that deleting spam comments would be a full time job if I were to just open it up for anyone without asking them to jump through a few hoops first.

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Anyone can register. No registrant's information is kept, used, or sold. CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Social Networking


Help the Soldiers!



American Genius

Our Founding Ideas

"Governments are instituted among men,deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776





Enter your Email


Preview
Powered by FeedBlitz

Subscribe in a reader




Recently Written

  • Girl Suspended from School For Saying ‘Bless You’ after a Sneeze
  • Man Beats Gun Charge With Joe Biden Defense
  • ‘Ethicist’ Richard Dawkins Says it’s ‘Immoral’ Not to Abort Down Syndrome Babies
  • Illegal Immigrant Who Killed 2 Girls Released, Protected by Obama’s DREAM-Styled Act
  • Ferguson: We’ve Seen Enough to Know That Mike Brown Was a Thug, Cop Innocent
  • Note the Difference Between Bundy Ranch Protest and Ferguson Riots
  • Despite What Quinn Claims, Illinois Leads In Job Loss
  • HuffPo ‘Reporter’ Stirs Race Hate in Ferguson
  • CNN Quietly Changes Story that DOJ Held Back Ferguson Robbery Video
  • We Should Not Call Them The ‘Ruling Class,’ But the ‘Immunes’


  • What THEY Say:
    Foreign News In English




    Click HERE for information
    on my fedora collection.
    Antique Stetsons, hat history...



























    Contact Us

    Email Publius' Forum

    Archives

  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005



  • Add to Technorati Favorites


    Clicky Web Analytics