FTC now very likely to oppose Google-AdMob
March 16, 2010 | Filed Under Budget, Business, Computers, Democrats/Leftists, Google, Government, Government, Corruption, Inernet, Liberals, Net Neutrality, Scott Cleland, Technology | 1 Comment
-By Scott Cleland
The FTC is now very likely to file an injunction in Federal Court to block Google’s proposed acquisition of AdMob, if Google does not walk away from the deal, given that Bloomberg reports that the FTC is “seeking sworn declarations from Google Inc. competitors and advertisers.”
Why such signed declarations are particularly indicative of the likely outcome is that the FTC has moved largely from an investigative phase to largely a prosecution phase.
Given reports of signed declarations, a preliminary decision has been made by the FTC investigative staff (with the assent of, or direction from, the FTC Chairman), that the deal would “substantially lessen competition.” In other words, the FTC staff believe the deal would be a violation of antitrust law.
Remember, neither the FTC nor competitors/advertisers take lightly the signing of legal declarations about what would be said under oath in a court of law under the penalty of perjury.
While Google and others will argue that no official decision has been made until the full commission votes to block the deal, and the FTC formally files an injunction in Federal Court, the reality is that a majority of Commissioners are very likely to back the staff and the Chairman in their detailed assessment of the anti-competitive impact of this deal.
Apparently the FTC staff/Chairman has concluded that this is a clear-cut, anti-competitive, horizontal merger case where Google, the #2 competitor in in-application mobile advertising with >25% share is seeking to buy their #1 competitor in that market, AdMob, which has >50% share of the market.
If the FTC staff has concluded that the market is some form of in-application mobile advertising, the Google-AdMob merger would effectively monopolize this strategically important gatekeeper market. For my detailed assessment of the anti-competitive problems of this deal see: Googleopoly V, and my recent analysis of the broader context of this deal.
With the FTC very likely to formally oppose Google-AdMob, what is Google likely to do?
Bottom-line: if Google’s past behavior in these circumstances is a good indicator of how they will act in this circumstance, Google will likely play hardball and brinksmanship, but then blink and back down at the last minute.
First, they will likely play hardball and brinksmanship.
In the Google-Yahoo Ad Agreement that DOJ blocked 11-5-08, Google took DOJ to the brink and only withdrew from the deal when DOJ was literally just a few hours away from filing a Section 1 & 2 Sherman antitrust monopolization case against Google, per Sandy Litvack, the DOJ’s lead counsel on the matter.
In the Google Book Settlement, Google has blown off the DOJ’s detailed antitrust, copyright and class action objections in DOJ’s statement of interest, in Google’s formal 77-page response to Google’s Book Settlement 2.0, effectively saying we’ll meet you in Federal District Court Judge Chin’s chambers.
Second, Google will likely blink and back down at the last minute when the FTC convinces Google that they are indeed resolute and fully prepared to file an injunction against the deal in court, unless Google drops the AdMob acquisition.
In my analysis, I do not think Google is so unwise as to choose this particular deal and this set of facts as their first big antitrust battleground in court.
Most importantly, the facts in this case are overwhelmingly against Google, if the court agrees with the FTC’s definition of the market as essentially the business that AdMob is in and that Google is contesting.
Moreover, Google will have a hard-time arguing that the relevant market should be much broader, given how much public evidence there is of Google arguing how much more targeted and measurable their advertising offering is than other forms of advertising.
To use a military analogy, choosing this case as their first antitrust battleground would be the tactical equivalent of choosing to attack cliffs from a swamp with the sun in their eyes.
Another big reason Google is likely to ultimately drop the acquisition of AdMob in the face of an FTC suit, is that Google does not want to trigger or egg on a potentially three-front antitrust war with the FTC over AdMob, DOJ over the Google Book Settlement, and EU over the the monopolization complaints of Foundem, ejustice.FR and Ciao.
In short, reports that the FTC is formally arming for a court battle over Google-AdMob is a strong signal that the FTC will very likely block Google’s acquisition of AdMob.
When Google takes it to the brink, Google will most likely blink again like they did when faced with DOJ’s opposition to Google-Yahoo.
The last thing Google wants to do is have its own actions or recalcitrance be the catalyst for a much broader and more serious antitrust crackdown on Google’s rapidly proliferating anti-competitive behavior.
So what does this development mean for Google going forward?
Google’s acquisition strategy involving companies of substantial size has hit an antitrust wall.
- The FTC has joined DOJ in believing Google is a monopoly that could warrant enforcement action in the future.
- The EU, which is generally more aggressive than the DOJ/FTC, is likely to eventually open a broader antitrust investigation of Google.
- Federal Court Judge Chin likely won’t approve the Google Book Settlement without a consent decree that empowers the DOJ to have ongoing oversight over the competitive aspects of Google’s book registry.
_________________
Scott Cleland is one of nation’s foremost techcom analysts and experts at the nexus of: capital markets, public policy and techcom industry change. He is widely-respected in industry, government, media and capital markets as a forward thinker, free market proponent, and leading authority on the future of communications. Precursor LLC is an industry research and consulting firm, specializing in the techcom sector, whose mission is to help companies anticipate change for competitive advantage. Cleland is also Chairman of NetCompetition.org, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Precursor LLC and an e-forum on Net Neutrality funded by a wide range of broadband telecom, cable and wireless companies. He previously founded The Precursor Group Inc., which Institutional Investor magazine ranked as the #1 “Best Independent” research firm in communications for two years in a row. His latest op eds can be seen at www.precursorblog.com.
Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Leave a Comment
If you would like to make a comment, please register to do so. I hate to do that but there are so many spam-bots out there that deleting spam comments would be a full time job if I were to just open it up for anyone without asking them to jump through a few hoops first.
You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Anyone can register. No registrant's information is kept, used, or sold. CLICK HERE TO REGISTER
Social Networking
Help the Soldiers!
American Genius
Our Founding Ideas- The Declaration of Independence
- The Federalist Papers
- The U.S. Constitution
- Debates of 1787
- The Anti-Federalist Papers
- The Writing of John Locke
"Governments are instituted among men,deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776
Recently Written
Featured Sites
What THEY Say:
Foreign News In English
Illini Alliance
Blogroll
of Thinking
Political Parties
Contact Us
Email Publius' ForumArchives
Links
Other Blogs
MilBlogs
Religion
Gun Rights
Education
Separation of School
from State
Radio Hosts
| Blog: |
| Publius' Forum |
Topics: |
| Politics, News, Commentary |
