Morgan, Guests Don’t Understand Constitution, Don’t Care

January 18, 2013 | Filed Under 2nd Amendment, Anti-Americanism, Cable, CNN, Constitution, Crime, Democrats/Leftists, Ethics, Gun Control, Guns, Journalism, Liberals, Media, Media Bias, Progressives, Regulation, TV, Warner Todd Huston | Comments Off on

Morgan, Guests Don’t Understand Constitution, Don’t Care

-By Warner Todd Huston

Piers Morgan indulged his desire to gut the Second Amendment once again on his CNN talk show, and while most of his efforts were well ridiculed by Joel Pollak last night, one thing he brought up is a typical, though uninformed, question that many leftists illegitimately use to try and show why they should have all the power they want to ban any sort of weapon they feel like banning.

Early in Piers Morgan’s now seemingly daily discussion on guns, he once again garbled terms, misled on types of weapons, and basically displayed a woeful ignorance on the Second Amendment, as well as a lack of knowledge about what is already banned and why. It is that latter question that needs further discussion.

During the CNN show, Michael Nutter, the Mayor of Detroit, broached the question.

Michael Nutter: This is not about the Second Amendment. As you have said earlier I have said certainly many, many times, why does a civilian need a military-styled assault weapon, why does a civilian need body armor? You cannot buy hand grenades. Those are weapons but somehow they are prohibited. You can’t buy an F15 just because you think that you’d like to have that kind of device. So, we need to talk about more serious things…

Piers Morgan: We already have, actually, a lot of gun control in America. This is the myth of this debate. There’s already substantial gun control and commissioner let me ask you this, there’s lots of things are banned already it’s merely a question really of degree. And I have yet to hear a good argument for why an AR15, which is a military-styled weapon, why that should be in civilian hands?

Myth was a good word for Piers to use because he is promulgating one.

Still, this seems like a sensible question. If the government can legitimately ban average citizens from having hand grenades and F15 jet fighters, using that same logic why can’t we go on banning any sort of weapon we want to ban?

This question, of course, is based upon a single assumption: that the founders couldn’t possibly have envisioned semi-automatic or automatic firearms.

An immediate point comes to mind here: does technology supersede our rights? After all, using the left’s logic the founders could not have envisioned the Internet, radio, or TV when they wrote the First Amendment. Should our rights to free speech be dispensed with simply because people today assume the founders were just too darn stupid to “get” the Internet?

They also couldn’t have “envisioned” any right to an abortion, a government takeover of healthcare or the welfare state, but liberals claim that all these things are justified under the Constitution, don’t they? Why the hypocritical disconnect?

But, that aside, the question of what the founders could envision is a good question that needs to be addressed. If the founders made their Second Amendment law based on ideas now out of date, shouldn’t we revisit them? And if we can ban a grenade or a nuclear bomb, why can’t we ban anything we want to ban?

First: were the founders just too stupid to understand that technology could change? No, the founders weren’t stupid. They were men of science and understood full well that things could change. They certainly understood that single shot muskets wouldn’t be the height of technology forever.

But, even if they were that stupid, it wouldn’t matter because the Amendment and terminology they used was specific enough to make the question of why nukes are banned and “assault weapons” aren’t to be illegitimate.

You see, the words “arms,” and “bear” had specific meanings to the founders and those definitions would not cover nuclear bombs, F15 fighter jets, or hand grenades any more than the words covered cannons, land mines, or ships of war in the founder’s own era.

Arms meant long arms or pistols (and even swords) to the founders. They were weapons that the individual used on the battlefield. They were not bombs, explosives, or weapons of mass destruction. Cannons and ships of war were the weapons of mass destruction of the founder’s day and those things are properly thought of as ordnance, not “arms.”

Further to “bear” means just what is says, to be able to hold and use as an individual. “Bear” also meant being able to place in one’s coat during the founder’s era. A single person cannot “bear” a cannon or a ship of war.

What does this all mean? It means that the founder’s definitions do not apply to nuclear bombs and F15 fighter jets.

So, next time you hear a liberal make this argument, you have something with which to reply.
“The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it.”
–Samuel Johnson

Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago based freelance writer. He has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and before that he wrote articles on U.S. history for several small American magazines. His political columns are featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart’s,, and, as well as,,,,, among many, many others. Mr. Huston is also endlessly amused that one of his articles formed the basis of an article in Germany’s Der Spiegel Magazine in 2008.

For a full bio, please CLICK HERE.



Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

We use Facebook comments, but they can sometimes take quite a while to load. So, be patient. Thanks.

Social Networking

Help the Soldiers!

American Genius

Our Founding Ideas

"Governments are instituted among men,deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776

Enter your Email

Powered by FeedBlitz

Subscribe in a reader

Recently Written

  • Congrats to ‘Doug Moore’: Texas Democrat Sheila Jackson Lee Doesn’t Even Know Who Won in Alabama
  • Pearl Harbor: Dec. 7, 1941, A Day That Will ‘Will Live in Infamy’
  • Tax Victory: Chicago/Cook County Soda Tax Canceled Starting Today
  • Charles Barkley Calls Steve Bannon a ‘White Separatist’
  • I’m floating on air (lyrics by Freddie Cosmo)
  • Happy Thanksgiving 2017
  • George Washington’s 1789 Thanksgiving Proclamation
  • Abraham Lincoln’s 1863 Thanksgiving Proclamation
  • President John Adams Thanksgiving: A Proclamation Recommending a National Day of Humiliation, Fasting, and Prayer
  • Our New, Post Weinstein World Order

  • What THEY Say:
    Foreign News In English

    Click HERE for information
    on my fedora collection.
    Antique Stetsons, hat history...

    Contact Us

    Email Publius' Forum


  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005

  • Add to Technorati Favorites

    Clicky Web Analytics