Google


‘Chicago Tribune’ Critic Slams America’s Love of Entertaining Super Bowl Ads

February 8, 2016 | Filed Under Anti-Americanism, Business, Capitalism, Chicago, Chicago Tribune, Democrats/Leftists, Economy/Finances, Entertainment, Ethics, Free Speech, Free Trade, Freedom, Government Corruption, Jobs, Liberals, Liberty, Media, Money, Progressives, Sports, TV, Warner Todd Huston | Comments Off on


‘Chicago Tribune’ Critic Slams America’s Love of Entertaining Super Bowl Ads

-By Warner Todd Huston

A Chicago Tribune TV critic was aghast that Americans often enjoy the commercials during the Super Bowl. Apparently he was upset about all that capitalism going on and mad that Americans don’t rise up and throw their shoes at their TVs in revolt. Corporations are apparently all venal and wasteful, he alleges, and we shouldn’t stand for it.

In his February 5 critique, Trib’s TV scribe Phil Rosenthal got his dander up several days before the Super Bowl as the nation had already begun talking about the commercials everyone was looking forward to seeing. The prospects of capitalism seemed to have put Rosenthal in a foul mood.

The columnist’s first assumption about why we enjoy many of the commercials was one literally no one believes.

“It’s as if the fact that some marketer spent $5 million per half minute — up about 11 percent from $4.5 million last year — to pitch more than 100 million of us in the Super Bowl 50 audience obliges us to actually pay attention,” he wrote.

No one watches Super Bowl commercials imagining they are obligated to do so because they are so expensive to air. No one.

But from this argument so early in his piece, one can begin to note the anti-corporate and anti-capitalist bent of the rest of the article.

Rosenthal then decried the ever-increasing costs of the ads saying we are all at fault for even watching them.

“The fact that many of us will spend more time debating the merits of these ads than the Academy Awards best picture winner helps justify next year’s price increase,” Rosenthal laments.

The writer went on to wag his finger at us all.

“But maybe, just maybe,” he wrote piously, “we should pause, think about what we’re doing, think about what advertisers are doing and give the celebration of these lavish commercial breaks a rest.”

Why take that pause? Because some ads are for the toe fungus cream Jublia made by Valeant Pharmaceuticals, a company that has been dragged before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform for exploitative drug pricing, he says. Then Rosenthal smears Valeant by associating the company with the antics of Turing Pharmaceuticals CEO Martin Shkreli who recently smirked his way through another House committee meeting. Because, you know, all CEOs are just like Martin Shkreli.

One can certainly denounce price gouging — if that is what Valeant Pharmaceuticals actually did — but Rosenthal’s next corporate attack to prove why we should all rise up against Super bowl ads was more tenuous still.

Rosenthal attacked Radio Shack for paying the big dollars for an ad even as it neared bankruptcy.

“I bet creditors wished it had saved its money. Employees might have had their own ideas,” he said ruefully.

Certainly the main point of advertising is to drum up business and what better time to drum up business than when your business is faltering?

In any case, Rosenthal finds all this advertising and capitalism to be all too gauche for his delicate sensibilities.

“Somewhere along the line, someone — maybe Don Draper, maybe Darrin Stephens — pitched Americans on the idea that television commercials are as much a part of Super Bowl Sunday as the game itself, and we bought it,” the columnist said.

Presumably the columnist meant to be wry by making allusions to ersatz 1950s and 1960s era ad men, but the truth is this Super bowl commercial business is quite a bit newer than Don Draper’s Mad Men era. As eras go the Super Bowl commercial era is far more recent, not nearly as old as TV itself as Rosenthal seems to feel.

But one senses Rosenthal’s disgust with the whole topic doesn’t really stem from the Super Bowl but from the fact that we even have advertising at all. If he’s mad at that, though, he needs to go back to the early 1800s to strangle that all American baby in its crib.

Next the columnist also goes another step too far. As above when he claimed we all watch the commercials in some overwrought enslavement to advertising dollars, he again makes an absurd claim “we bought” the idea that the TV commercials are “as much a part of Super Bowl Sunday as the game itself.” If the commercials stopped next year, it would certainly not be the end of our enjoyment of the game.

In the end, Rosenthal worries that daring to watch the commercials is a “transaction with a lot of implications.”

So, what are we to make of all this? Are we as Americans somehow selling out to evil capitalism? Are we being fooled? Has big business played us for idiots? Should we view the commercials with suspicion and warn our fellows that they are an evil to be warded off?

Why do we watch these ads? Why are they so fun to talk about? In the end we watch the ads because they are usually funny or touching. But, come on. Like the game itself, it is just entertainment, no different than going to see a play or taking in a movie. Another reason we watch them is because Super Bowl commercials are so expensive the ad men usually bring their A game often making them even more entertaining. Regardless, people just want to be entertained. As viewers we don’t care what they cost and the price tag doesn’t make us enjoy them any more or any less.

Ultimately Rosenthal is off the mark about why we enjoy Super Bowl ads. It’s just good clean fun for all of us out in TV land. As to the costs, that sorts itself out. If the companies eventually find the ads aren’t worth the expenditure they will stop doing it.

That is, after all, how capitalism works. Besides, it isn’t Phil’s business what a corporation does with its money and it isn’t ours either.

Finally, let’s be honest about Rosenthal’s argument. We can use his attack on the ads against the NFL itself. Many insist sports are the opiate of the masses and if we just stop patronizing it maybe it’ll all just go away.

But, again, it’s just entertainment. If you stand against the ads, there is no reason not to stand against the game, too. In the end, why buy anything? Aren’t we just encouraging that darned ol’ capitalism bully?

After reading the piece, one is tempted to tell Rosenthal to lighten up.
____________
“The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it.”
–Samuel Johnson

Follow Warner Todd Huston on:
Twitter
Facebook
Tumblr

Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago based freelance writer. He has been writing news, opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and before that wrote articles on U.S. history for several American history magazines. Huston is a featured writer for Andrew Breitbart’s Breitbart News, and he appears on such sites as RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, Wizbang.com, and many, many others. Huston has also appeared on Fox News, Fox Business Network, CNN, and many local TV shows as well as numerous talk radio shows throughout the country.

For a full bio, please CLICK HERE.


NOTE: If you want to comment, for some reason our Facebook comments section takes a bit of time to load. It’ll pop up soon. Thanks

Comments

comments

Tags: , , , , , ,


Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

We use Facebook comments, but they can sometimes take quite a while to load. So, be patient. Thanks.

Social Networking


Help the Soldiers!



American Genius

Our Founding Ideas

"Governments are instituted among men,deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776





Enter your Email


Preview
Powered by FeedBlitz

Subscribe in a reader




Recently Written

  • Same Old, Same Old, Terrorism
  • Dear Conservatives, Supergirl Thinks You’re Stupid and She Doesn’t Want You Watching Her Show
  • Nate Boyer, NFL Player and Army Veteran Who Helped Colin Kaepernick Take a Knee During Anthem, Pens ‘Open Letter’
  • FBI Warns of Growing Domestic Terror Threat Posed by Black Extremist Groups
  • Video: PBS News Hour Victim of Violent, Senseless Attack
  • My Home and Car Vandalized Because I’m a Conservative Writer
  • Here are the Vast Differences Between a Conservative and a Liberal
  • No, NFL, You DON’T Have an Unassailable ‘Right’ to Protest the National Anthem
  • Pandering? Megyn Kelly Suddenly Says She Left Fox News Because of Trump
  • Famed ‘Raging Bull’ Boxer Jake LaMotta Dies at 95


  • What THEY Say:
    Foreign News In English




    Click HERE for information
    on my fedora collection.
    Antique Stetsons, hat history...



























    Contact Us

    Email Publius' Forum

    Archives

  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005



  • Add to Technorati Favorites


    Clicky Web Analytics