Trump Was Gaining on Clinton Even Before New FBI Investigation Into Her Email Scandal

November 1, 2016 | Filed Under Anti-Americanism, Democrats/Leftists, Donald Trump, Elections, Ethics, Government, Government Corruption, Hillary Clinton, Liberals, President, Progressives, Republicans, Vote Fraud, Voter ID, Warner Todd Huston | Comments Off on

Trump Was Gaining on Clinton Even Before New FBI Investigation Into Her Email Scandal

-By Warner Todd Huston

The polls for the upcoming presidential election, now only a week away, were already starting to tighten even before the shocking revelations that FBI Director James Comey reopened the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illegal email server hidden in her Chappaqua home when she was Obama’s Secretary of State. If they were tightening before the renewed criminal investigation into her actions, one shudders to think what they will show early this week once polls taken after the announcement begin to be reflected in their results.

During the middle two weeks of October between the 10th and 21st (the FBI announcement came late on the 28th) many of the presidential polls across the nation had already begun to show movement in favor of GOP nominee Donald Trump. By the end of that period many of the polls had become statistical ties as time and again Trump had closed to within the margin of error (MOE) or close to it both in national as well as state-based surveys.

For instance, the most recent average of polls taken ending no later than October 27 saw Clinton leading with only a plus 3.4. But in most cases these polls had an MOE of 2 and one half to 3 and one half points meaning that the polls were nearly a statistical tie.

Further the trajectory lines showed Trump gaining throughout October.

The outlier in that batch was the CNBC poll taken during October 21 and 24 (MOE 3.5 points), but this one was taken of a relatively small 804 respondents and of registered voters instead of likely voters. Most of the time pollsters say polls of likely voters is more accurate.

So, aside from one at Clinton plus six and another at Clinton plus five, most showed Clinton only a plus one or two. Even a plus three is not much of a lead when the margin of error is nearly three points!

Elsewhere, a piece at posted on Sunday revealed that Trump’s average in a four-way race with the Libertarian and Green Party candidates is the best it’s been all year. By Sunday Trump was measuring in at 41.6 percent and, again, these are all from polls taken before the impact of the new FBI investigation is measured by pollsters.

As to Hillary, she was at 45 percent meaning Trump had closed to within about three points nation wide.

We can also take a look at the ABC News/Washington Post poll which shows Trump rising seven points From October 23 to the 28. The ABC poll found the race sitting at 46 Clinton to 45 Trump.

And the ABC poll is one of the first to ask voters about the new FBI investigation.

About a third of likely voters say they’re less likely to support Clinton given FBI Director James Comey’s disclosure Friday that the bureau is investigating more emails related to its probe of Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state. Given other considerations, 63 percent say it makes no difference.

That measured in at about 34 percent of voters who said the new allegations could change their vote. If even only half of that 34 percent changed their vote it could be catastrophic for Hillary.

But numbers guru Sean Trende of the RCP average of polls is quick to note that the margin of error is one thing, but the big thing that worries many pollsters is the turnout models they are using to predict the final vote.

You see, pollsters don’t just ask equal numbers of Republicans, Democrats, and independents who they may support, they try to guess what percentage of each group will actually vote and then they shape their polls according to those percentages.

But the problem is, many pollsters are worried that there is a large segment of voters that have not voted in years but who just might come out for Donald Trump. The real estate mogul has made this “hidden electorate” a major talking point but he isn’t just blowing smoke because pollsters really are worried about this shadowy group. They are worried because it is impossible to calculate. Will these “hidden voters” be a huge wave coming out of the woodwork for Trump or a trickle that won’t much matter.

But even if it is a trickle, that may be just enough to topple Hillary from her plus three lead.

Here is how Trende explained this predicament at

Even with a two-point race, sampling errors (MOE) should cancel each other out, leaving the true value as the average. The odds of dozens of polls being off in one direction even by two points by random chance is perishingly small.

What we’re concerned about is modeling error, where subjective choices made by pollsters move them off the true value. So, for example, if they think the African-American share of the electorate should be 13%, but it is 11%, that’s not MOE stuff or statistical stuff. It’s just the pollster being flat-out wrong about how to weight the raw data. Again, there’s no good way to assign a probability to that.

PJMedia’s Michael Walsh also notes that there a a list of “intangibles” this election that have impeded pollsters. There isn’t just the “hidden voter” issue, but others. Walsh says:

There’s little question that the Trump-Pence ticket has generated far more visible enthusiasm among its supporters than the dour Washington death march of Clinton and Tim Kaine.

Less remarked is Trump’s overwhelming superiority on social media, including Twitter, Instagram and Facebook, where Trump’s page has double the “likes” of Clinton’s (10 million to 5 million). Further, Trump is said to average 30,000 viewers on live-streamed YouTube events, compared to Clinton’s mere 500.

Clinton has big money on her side, but Trump has big motivation. Both the “intangibles” and AI models showing a Trump victory take these factors into account.

Then there are the huge crowds showing up for Trump rallies. Clinton has been lucky to turn out a thousand supporters at any particular rally — even in her best states — while Trump routinely speaks before 10,000, 20,000, 30,000 and even more. These are unprecedented numbers for a Republican. Heck, they are high even for the average Democrat presidential candidate. Only Obama rivaled those numbers during his two campaigns for the White House.

Again, I can’t stress enough that all this was happening before the FBI’s announcement and before polls were able to fully reflect how potential voters will feel about that new FBI investigation into Hillary’s email scandal.

We do have a few indications of how voters might come to feel about Hillary’s latest criminal charges. Aside from the ABC poll mentioned above, a CBS poll also found respondents worried over Clinton’s new scandal.

The CBS poll found that fully 48 percent of voters think the new investigation will reveal “damaging information” about Clinton. Naturally 71 percent of Democrats say it won’t affect their feeling for Hillary, but whether it will serve to suppress Democrat turnout is another question. And, again, with the race so close in so many states, even a small loss of Democrat support will hurt Clinton.

Finally, I want to make one final point that could end up hurting Hillary even more as the news about the FBI investigation filters throughout the country.

Clinton is revving up her response to Director Comey’s announcement and it appears that her initial response is going to be to savage Comey and to try and besmirch his reputation. This is the same top G-man who the Clinton machine was praising only months ago when he had torpedoed the earlier investigation into her illegal email server.

As far as Clinton and her surrogates were concerned, Comey was the best of the bet back then. Now they are ready to say he’s “destroying American democracy” with his new investigation.

The perfect example of this line of attack was exhibited by Democrat National Committee Chair and Clinton apologist Donna Brazile.

Back in July, Brazile tweeted out that Republicans attacking Comey’s decision to end the earlier investigation were destroying our democracy by questioning the FBI director. But this weekend it was she who was questioning the FBI director that only months ago she claimed was beyond reproach. Now Barzile is out there claiming that Comey is the one destroying our democracy.

This hypocritical effort to have it both ways won’t be lost on many independent voters who may have been leaning toward Clinton.

All of this could have a major impact on the election and turnout. So, it is all anybody’s guess.
“The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it.”
–Samuel Johnson

Follow Warner Todd Huston on:

Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago based freelance writer. He has been writing news, opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and before that wrote articles on U.S. history for several American history magazines. Huston is a featured writer for Andrew Breitbart’s Breitbart News, and he appears on such sites as,, BizPac Review, and many, many others. Huston has also appeared on Fox News, Fox Business Network, CNN, and many local TV shows as well as numerous talk radio shows throughout the country.

For a full bio, please CLICK HERE.

NOTE: If you want to comment, for some reason our Facebook comments section takes a bit of time to load. It’ll pop up soon. Thanks



Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

We use Facebook comments, but they can sometimes take quite a while to load. So, be patient. Thanks.

Social Networking

Help the Soldiers!

American Genius

Our Founding Ideas

"Governments are instituted among men,deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776

Enter your Email

Powered by FeedBlitz

Subscribe in a reader

Recently Written

  • Liberal Media Pushes Fake News That Florida Killer Was a Member of a ‘White Supremacist Group’
  • Discussing Guns … With a Child
  • Dead Not Counted Before Liberals Start Lying About Florida School Shooting
  • Memo ‘Reporting’ Proves the American Media are Part of the Democrat Party
  • Illinois Senator Dick Durbin is the PERFECT Example for Repeal of the 17th Amendment
  • You Can’t Be Both a Liberal AND an American at the Same Time
  • CW’s New ‘Black Lightning’ Super Hero Series Reveals the Hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors
  • Illinois Senator Dick Durbin Has a Long History of Lies and Calumny
  • California and Illinois Rank as Worst States and People are Moving Out in Droves
  • Seattle Soda Tax Worst Case Showing How Liberals Hurt the Little Guy

  • What THEY Say:
    Foreign News In English

    Click HERE for information
    on my fedora collection.
    Antique Stetsons, hat history...

    Contact Us

    Email Publius' Forum


  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005

  • Add to Technorati Favorites

    Clicky Web Analytics