Google


Today We See How Many Un-American Electoral College ‘Faithless Electors’ Vote Against Donald Trump

December 19, 2016 | Filed Under Anti-Americanism, Civil War, Congress, Constitution, Democrats/Leftists, Donald Trump, Elections, Ethics, Founders, Government, Government Corruption, Hillary Clinton, Law, Liberals, President, Progressives, Revolutionary War, Senate, Slavery, Vote Fraud, Warner Todd Huston | Comments Off on


Today We See How Many Un-American Electoral College ‘Faithless Electors’ Vote Against Donald Trump

-By Warner Todd Huston

Today, December 19, is the day the electors meet to cast their Electoral College votes to actually certify who will become the next president of the United States and if the anti-American left has its way enough of these electors will defy their duty and vote for anyone other than the actual winner, Donald J. Trump. Even if this last second effort doesn’t beat Trump, the whole campaign is thoroughly anti-American and can’t end well.

Thanks to our horrid system of (mis)education, many Americans are just waking up to news of the Electoral College (EC). Many are surprised over the way we’ve chosen our president since the beginning. They are shocked that we’ve never elected our president via the “popular vote” because we are not a democracy. We are a representative republic and the EC is one of the ways we manifest that “representative” part of our system.

What is the EC?

The Electoral College is currently made up of 538 electors. 270 or more of their votes are required to elect a President. Each state’s allotment of electors is determined by the number of members in its Congressional delegation which equals one for each member in their delegation to the House of Representatives along with one for each Senator.

Most states now have a “winner-take-all” system that awards all electors to the candidate who won the state’s popular vote. But Maine and Nebraska currently utilize a variation of “proportional representation.”

How Does The EC Vote?

The electors meet together in their respective states on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in the December after the presidential election. Contrary to what many imagine, the electors do not meet in one great hall somewhere in Washington D.C., but in their separate states. This is one of the reasons that it is harder than the liberals would think to sway their votes. The electors would have to be swayed in persuasion campaigns in spanning all 50 states (or at least the several where a major change would make a difference), not during a meeting at one central convention. That decentralization was a key aspect of why the founders felt the EC would be beyond influences.

Prager University has a great video explaining the EC:

A Short History of the EC’s Origination

The EC was set up by Article II of the U.S. Constitution but after the elections of 1789 and 1800 problems arose. Changes were then proposed by the Twelfth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ratified in 1804.

While the EC itself wasn’t changed with the amendment, the Twelfth did change how the candidates run for the top two offices in the nation. After the two very problematic and contentious elections proved that our original system was not working, it was decided that the presidential and vice presidential candidates would run together on a ticket instead of the previous system whereby the VP was automatically bestowed upon the first runner up for the presidency.

After the rather easy first two elections of George Washington, the founders very quickly learned that the emerging party system made their original idea a major problem. They discovered that if the second runner up was a person of an opposing party he would not work well with his new president and boss and the whole executive office would start out on a contentious note. The first election to be carried out under the Twelfth Amendment was the election of 1804, Thomas Jefferson’s second term.

But that glitch aside, the original EC was still a valid idea as it was meant as a way to make sure that presidential candidates don’t focus only on a handful of the most populous states. Instead it forces candidates to pay equal attention to the smaller states in an effort to make sure candidates treat the whole of the country as worthy of notice during their campaigns. This gave the small states a voice in the elections.

Some may argue that the EC still gives the big states the main voice, but the fact is those big states change over time and there are several paths to gain the needed 270 EC votes. So, the EC does force candidates to devise campaigns to do more than just stump in the three or four biggest states while ignoring the rest of the country.

What if the EC Was Eliminated?

Let’s put it this way, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in California with 8,753,788 votes. Trump won only 4,483,810 in the Golden State. That means Hillary won 4,269,978 more votes than Trump did there. Tump lost the popular vote nationwide by just under three million votes. So, in essence California gave Hillary the popular vote win. Without California?

Well, if you deduct Hillary’s California win from Her final vote total then Trump beat her by nearly six million votes. In other words, Hillary was elected president of California and Trump was elected president of the rest of the nation. Without the EC California would have canceled the vote of the whole country and disenfranchised everyone not living in California.

So, Can the EC Change Votes?

Now, this whole nonsense being floated by liberals that the electors of the EC can meet and discuss the election and then decide whether or not to change their votes is all a load of crap. The electors are supposed to simply meet and file their votes as directed by their state rules, not sit around and discuss the election, deliberate over the situation, and make new decisions that alter the November 8 outcome. There simply are no decisions meant to be made during a meeting of the EC. They are just supposed to deliver their vote. Period. End of story.

After all, the people of the states have elected these electors to cast their vote to represent the wishes of the people, they didn’t vote for them to go re-hash the entire campaign for president. If the electors start changing votes they are essentially disenfranchising their state’s own voters, illegally taking votes away from the people. Any change of EC votes is nothing short of vote fraud and if Hillary doesn’t denounce this she is a party to vote fraud.

But it appears that the disenfranchisement of voters, the destruction of our over 200-year-old election system, and the total disrespect for the tradition of the peaceful transfer of power is nothing that bothers anti-American liberals all that much.

In the last few weeks leftists have banded together to force EC electors, many of whom are just normal Americans, to change their votes. And far from a mere information campaign and arguing their point logically, the left has launched a vicious attack on electors by releasing their home phone numbers, their addresses, work emails, and work phone numbers and have even began targeting these electors’ friends and neighbors.

Electors have been receiving harassing phone calls and a massive number of death threats unless they bow to the left’s mob mentality and change their votes to end up casting a vote against Trump.

And so far every attempt the left has tried to force the issue has failed. Last week a mere two electors tried to get a court to allow them to ignore a state law that they had to cast their vote for the winner chosen by the majority of voters in their state. The court denied their request. And now a group dull-witted “celebrities” created a video aimed at electors to force them to surrender themselves to the left.

This isn’t to say that all electors have always voted in accordance with their regulated duties. There have been times when electors have broken their faith with the rules and revolted. But none of these incidents ever seriously threatened the out come of an election. And there isn’t much likelihood that the EC will meet today and enough “faithless electors” will be on hand to change the outcome we all learned about early on November 9.

But what has been happening with the anti-American left may portend troubles in the future. After all, the left has just spent a full month working to undermine not just the nascent Trump administration, but also causing a whole party to lose faith in the system we’ve used with little complaint for over 200 years.

This is not a good thing, to be sure. If this hatred and distrust of our system becomes fully inculcated into the Democrat Party, this will be only the first time we see a loosing Democrat Party working to undermine our electoral system.

If this continues, it can’t end well.

Lastly I need to point out this historical fact: the last time a large number of electors were faithless is when Virginia’s entire delegation reused to vote in 1836. And guess what these Democrats were protesting? You guessed it, the topic was slavery. They were mad that Martin Van Buren’s vice presidential candidate, Richard Mentor Johnson, had an open sexual relationship with a black woman. 23 Virginia Democrats refused to do their duty because they hated that a white person was in love with a black person.

Yes, Democrats are always looking to destroy the system ver something disgusting, aren’t they?
____________
“The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it.”
–Samuel Johnson

Follow Warner Todd Huston on:
Twitter
Facebook
Tumblr

Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago based freelance writer. He has been writing news, opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and before that wrote articles on U.S. history for several American history magazines. Huston is a featured writer for Andrew Breitbart’s Breitbart News, and he appears on such sites as Constitution.com, CanadaFreePress.com, BizPac Review, and many, many others. Huston has also appeared on Fox News, Fox Business Network, CNN, and many local TV shows as well as numerous talk radio shows throughout the country.

For a full bio, please CLICK HERE.


NOTE: If you want to comment, for some reason our Facebook comments section takes a bit of time to load. It’ll pop up soon. Thanks

Comments

comments

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

We use Facebook comments, but they can sometimes take quite a while to load. So, be patient. Thanks.

Social Networking


Help the Soldiers!



American Genius

Our Founding Ideas

"Governments are instituted among men,deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776





Enter your Email


Preview
Powered by FeedBlitz

Subscribe in a reader




Recently Written

  • Same Old, Same Old, Terrorism
  • Dear Conservatives, Supergirl Thinks You’re Stupid and She Doesn’t Want You Watching Her Show
  • Nate Boyer, NFL Player and Army Veteran Who Helped Colin Kaepernick Take a Knee During Anthem, Pens ‘Open Letter’
  • FBI Warns of Growing Domestic Terror Threat Posed by Black Extremist Groups
  • Video: PBS News Hour Victim of Violent, Senseless Attack
  • My Home and Car Vandalized Because I’m a Conservative Writer
  • Here are the Vast Differences Between a Conservative and a Liberal
  • No, NFL, You DON’T Have an Unassailable ‘Right’ to Protest the National Anthem
  • Pandering? Megyn Kelly Suddenly Says She Left Fox News Because of Trump
  • Famed ‘Raging Bull’ Boxer Jake LaMotta Dies at 95


  • What THEY Say:
    Foreign News In English




    Click HERE for information
    on my fedora collection.
    Antique Stetsons, hat history...



























    Contact Us

    Email Publius' Forum

    Archives

  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005



  • Add to Technorati Favorites


    Clicky Web Analytics