Why Google Is Not Neutral

November 13, 2009 | Filed Under Anti-Americanism, Business, Cable, Capitalism, Computers, Congress, Economy/Finances, Entertainment, Free Trade, Google, Government, Corruption, Inernet, Liberals, Net Neutrality, Scott Cleland, Society/Culture, Taxes, Technology | 2 Comments

-By Scott Cleland

After discussing whether Google should buy The New York Times, Google decided against it because it “would damage its ‘neutral’ identity,” per Ken Auletta’s just-published book “Googled: The End of The World as We know It.”

Google has long claimed to be neutral. Their corporate philosophy statement claims: “We never manipulate rankings to put our partners higher in our search results and no one can buy better PageRank. Our users trust our objectivity and no short-term gain could ever justify breaching that trust.”

As the world-leading corporate proponent of an industrial policy to mandate net neutrality for all its potential broadband competitors in cloud computing, and as the beneficiary of “The Google Loophole” in the FCC’s proposed open Internet regulations (para 104), it is fair to stress test whether Google’s claim of a “neutral’ identity is true or just cleverly-executed PR.

Is Google Neutral?
Read more

Bookmark to:

How FCC Regulation Would Change the Internet

November 6, 2009 | Filed Under 1st Amendment, Business, Capitalism, Computers, Congress, Democrats/Leftists, Economy/Finances, Free Trade, Freedom, Google, Government, Corruption, Inernet, Liberals, Media Bias, Net Neutrality, Scott Cleland, Society/Culture, Taxes, Technology | No Comments

-By Scott Cleland

The FCC’s claims that their proposed net neutrality regulations would just “preserve” the open Internet are simply not true. The facts clearly state that the FCC’s proposed regulations would: Be a big change in FCC Internet policy; Implement big Internet policy changes without Congressional authorization; and Change the Internet in big ways. (The one-page PDF version of this post is here)

The FCC’s proposed net neutrality regs are a big change in FCC Internet policy; they would:

Replace the FCC’s voluntary net neutrality guidelines with mandated net neutrality regulations;
Selectively apply net neutrality regulations to only broadband and not to applications/content providers like the current principles do;
Add two completely new net neutrality principles that are not found in law or congressional policy:
Mandate the strictest non-discrimination requirement in the last 75 years;
Mandate public disclosure of detailed proprietary network management techniques for the first time;
Expand application of net neutrality to wireless and satellite broadband for the very first time;
Expand consumers access to content entitlement by adding entitlement to send/distribute content as well;
Redefine entitlement to competition in the current fourth principle, to favor resale competition over facilities-based competition;
Subject broadband companies to a new “Mother-may-I” FCC approval process for offering new managed services and for experimenting with new business models; and
Subordinate private standard-setting bodies, like the IETF, to new FCC omni-technical oversight/approval.